Unfortunately, this is another case of "the proprietor is always right".
Having said that, if the owner has already earned two shares of this pot, it does not seem right to see him take a "cut" on top of that. On the other hand, if the owner did not arrange these sponsors, you'd have no bonus money for which to shoot. It's kind of a Catch-22.
One man's opinion ... our lines are open ...
My question is "What do you mean by a cut of the money". Is it just his share for shooting the 2-300's or does he take money off the top and then splits the rest?
Jim
When I was a proprietor I would not have given myself any cash award for shooting an honor score. Cash awards like that are for the bowlers, not the owner/manager.
I suppose that is a question of what your personal ethics are, but that's my opinion.